| Gray
trees line the banks of the river, their crooked fingers pointing skyward.
I have come here before, in the deep of winter, wading through high-drifted
snow to taste of crisp, black-and-white solitude.
It is in the barren seasons when tales are told. The featureless river,
emboldened by the temporary plainness of the land, waxes talkative, endlessly
lapping at the shore's ear with accounts of the life history of each fish
it has spawned and the circumstances of the numerous creatures in its murky
depths.
Narratives relating to the great custodians who tend the world mechanism
have always thrilled me. Once I listened with wide, youthful eyes to descriptions
of Jack Frost, pixie painter of the world's brilliant autumn leaves.
Trudging to and from school, I sometimes half-expected to see him in the
foliage, palette in one hand and brush in the other, working his chromatic
magic.
I have learned from the Jack Frost story and a host of other traditions.
Narratives about Odin and the Gods of the North and their Rainbow Bridge
into Valhalla. About the fateful encounter of Paris, royal shepherd boy,
with the Olympian goddesses Aphrodite and Minerva and later with the besieging
hordes of Agamemnon. About fiery tongues descending on the Apostles at
Pentecost two thousand years ago.
There is freedom in being able to evaluate segments of a claim on individual
merits without compulsion to accept or reject the thesis as a total. The
annual coloration of the land can be accepted whatever the cause, pixie
or temperature. So, also, the concept of a variegated inner light of intellectuality
and spirituality (like a rainbow bridge) leading one to an exalted state
of being. Or appreciation of the profound discord that can ensue when one
presumes to deal with divinity divided--a paradoxical contradiction
in terms and an impossibility.
I can appreciate the excitement of the Apostles' preaching on the day
of their visitation, whether the fiery tongues were figurative or literal.
Now I face a tradition about something called time, flowing invisibly,
impalpably, metamorphosing what IS into what WILL BE. How can I hope to
transcend a reality so vaguely defined?
In the river before me, vortices spin themselves into conical forms.
They whisk about, then unwind themselves into nonexistence. Cyclical motion
is a creator of illusion. An electron flashes around a circular route,
spinning into being a hollow ball thousands of times its own size. A rotating
fan blade weaves into existence a hazy disk of motion that can be touched.
Objects, I see, are balloons blown up into the world of
form by internal motion. This line of thought, stimulated by the
motions of the river, seems to be putting me on the trail of some kind
of an understanding of time. It all has to do with motion . . . .
* * *
Suppose the motions constituting my life processes were to be slowed
down by several orders of magnitude. In such a condition, my breathing
would come incredibly slowly and my words would drip from peculiarly unquivering
lips like beads of molasses. Movement seeming slow to my associates would
streak me by too fast for perception. To those around me, my life span
would seem lengthened.
I, however, would see the world and everyone else speed up. I would
see time accelerated.
Suppose my bodily processes had instead been miraculously halted for
a thousand years as measured by a clock laid beside me in a secret cavern.
Generations and empires might rise and pass as I lay in the hidden vault.
The motions of time would grind my clothes into dust as minerals suspended
in groundwater, dripping from the cathedral ceiling, erected calcareous
icicles above and below me.
With the return of consciousness, I would feel as if no time had passed.
But the clock beside me would belie my feelings.
Would time have been altered by this hypothetical manipulation of motion
in my bodily processes--or only my perception of time?
* * *
Imagine an icy sphere of absolute zero temperature enclosing one-half
of the universe, stopping all motion in it for a thousand years as observed
by the other half of creation. If the frozen half of the cosmos could then
be reconstituted and re-imbued with motion, the universe would subsequently
be divided in opinion over the matter of the current time, each half considering
the other to be in error in the amount of one millennium.
Time would apparently have gone on as usual in the warmer half of the
universe; therefore, maybe only time perception in the colder climes
would have been altered, and not time itself.
But what if the icy sphere were in concept to be drawn around the
whole creation?
No clock would tick, no water droplet fall to the ground in all the
hovering worlds. No grain of sand would shift. Throughout the vast, lightless
galaxies, no wind would stir.
Were motion then to be resumed--or even were it not--would time have
passed during the period of motionlessness? Would there have been
a period of motionlessness? If so, how much? A second? A billion years?
Motion would have been stopped; and as a consequence, time--according
to all possible tests and observations--would have ceased to be.
It seems that time is just a word for motion.
4. The Myth of Time
|